CRank: 5Score: 20280

He's fucking pumped. Man looks like Vin Diesel. Doesn't really bother me, as his face actually looks very similar to the 2nd game, apart from the lack of hair and the new beard. Dunno why people are so bothered about him having worked out a bit.

5724d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Fucking flamebait article.

5724d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

A 9/10 from Edge for a Sony exclusive? What is this, a late April Fools' Joke?

5724d ago 4 agree4 disagreeView comment

Peter Jackson.

5735d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

Havok is shit compared to Euphoria. Euphoria is fucking awesome, and they improved it a lot from GTA 4.

5735d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

I had trouble for a different reason - the bear I hunted down tried to run away. It was annoying having to chase it down. I came close with the one before it, but some fucking wolves came out of nowhere and stole the kill.

5735d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Is fucking badass. Definitely worth the effort. Shame you can't use it on mission replays. Marston automatically wears his default outfit, and you can't change it. Also, you can't use your current guns or horse.

5735d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

People criticize MGS4 for being too action-orientated, when sneaking is well-rewarded. I bet they haven't even played it on Solid Normal difficulty.

5736d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

The framerate's fine. The only noticeable drop for me was when everyone in the Armadillo saloon crammed through the door at once.

5737d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

But still way too fucking hot. Seriously. Either it's too cold, or it's too hot. No middle ground.

5740d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

The amount of stuff you can do, and the randomness of events already makes it more enjoyable. Plus, the shooting is a lot more fun.

Only thing is, the hand to hand is terrible.

5740d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

They said pretty much the same thing regarding GTA IV.

5741d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

But it sure as hell isn't as huge a difference as the ridiculous amount of articles that came flooding in suggested. I've got it on PS3, and it looks amazing, even on my shitty SDTV. It's funny how none of those articles mentioned the faster loading times for the PS3 version.

5741d ago 3 agree6 disagreeView comment

And I haven't noticed any major frame-rate drops, although there is quite a bit of pop-in. Definitely not bad, though.

5741d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

From HMV in the Bullring. Awesome, AWESOME game.

5742d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

because N4G obviously represents the majority of PS3 owners...

5743d ago 5 agree5 disagreeView comment

When it comes to the PS3 is just as laughable.

5743d ago 26 agree8 disagreeView comment

I love the PS3 phat ejection. It just feels so... futuristic.

Hated the system on the PSOne and PS2 slim. That just felt boring.

5743d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

There's a noticeable difference, but it's not as bad as I was expecting. Obviously, the PS3 version is a little blurrier and jaggier, but it's not too significant for me.

The comments from the poster on that sight are blatant flamebait, btw.

5744d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

Then it's just laziness on Rockstar's part. Still gonna get it, though, because I have a shitty SDTV anyway, and the game itself looks fantastic.

5747d ago 6 agree2 disagreeView comment